Connecting the dots

What we've got here is failure to communicate. — Strother Martin (as Captain) in Cool Hand Luke

With the shutdown of schools as a result of the containment efforts surrounding COVID-19, my wife and I, along with most parents, have added teacher to our resumes. As part of the daily schoolwork, my five-year-old daughter is doing some connect-the-dots work, where you follow the numbers and connect the dots to create a picture.

I bring this up as it’s a very simple explanation of what our team does. We take many different data points and pieces of information to create a picture of what we believe the future of the equity and fixed income markets might look like.

One of those data points that we pay specific attention to is the manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI). This index is created based on the results of a monthly survey to gauge the health of the manufacturing sector of various countries around the world. The survey is scored with a baseline of 50, meaning that a number above 50 indicates expansion and below 50 indicates contraction. This index gives us valuable insight into the health of the economy and the likely direction of corporate earnings.

While there are different companies that produce similar indices, our team looks at two: IHS Markit and the Institute for Supply Management (ISM). Markit produces PMI indices for many countries around the world, whereas ISM is specific to the United States. We’ve seen a fairly strong relationship between the monthly ISM and year-over-year earnings growth for the S&P 500, advanced six months, going back to 1955. To put it simply, the current PMI data gives us a good indication of where the S&P 500 earnings growth is likely to trend six months from now.

The result for the month of March was 49.1, which we believe didn’t fully reflect the impact from COVID-19. The April data was just released, and the survey result was 41.5, the lowest level since the financial crisis. A figure of 45 is typically indicative of a recession. The current level of PMI would suggest that earnings growth could fall by 20–30% over the next six months. Given current valuation, we don’t believe that the market is fully reacting to this potential downside risk.

This chart illustrates that earnings growth in the US has historically had a strong correlation to the ISM Purchasing Managers Index with a 6-month lag. The data starts at 1996 and ends at March, 31, 2020. At current level of 41.5, the PMI would imply negative earnings growth yoy for the S&P 500 Index over the next 6 months. The level of earnings decline could hit levels not seen since the Financial Crisis, near -30%.

Although this decline was quite sharp, it’s actually worse underneath the surface. The PMI is a composite of five different components on an equally weighted basis: new orders (seasonally adjusted), production (seasonally adjusted), employment (seasonally adjusted), supplier deliveries (seasonally adjusted), and inventories. One of these sub-indices, supplier deliveries, is inverse to the others, meaning that a number above 50 indicates that deliveries were slower than normal, which is typical as the economy improves and customer demand increases. However, the high index reading in April was primarily a product of coronavirus-related supply problems, not increased demand. In this context, the high reading for supplier deliveries should be viewed as a negative rather than a positive. If we remove this abnormality from the calculation, and only use the other four sub-indices, the PMI would be a dismal 32.9, suggesting potentially a steeper decline in earnings over the next six months.

The second chart is the same as the first, with one slight change. The most recent data point was adjusted to remove Supplier Deliveries. The April month end data point now falls to 32.9, rather than 41.5, suggesting that earnings could be even weaker than expected.

While the current forward earnings estimate of the S&P 500 Index for fiscal 2020 would suggest a decline of only 15% this year, the PMI would imply that’s overly optimistic and not a true reflection of the negative impact that the shutdown will have on corporate earnings.

When we connect the dots on this picture, we seem to have a much different result. While we believe there are opportunities at a company-specific level, we fear that the overall market has moved ahead of the fundamentals. In this environment, we remind investors that asset allocation is a moving target and we need to keep moving with it.

Kevin Headland, CIM
Senior Investment Strategist

A rise in interest rates typically causes bond prices to fall. The longer the average maturity of the bonds held by a fund, the more sensitive a fund is likely to be to interest-rate changes. The yield earned by a fund will vary with changes in interest rates.

Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect the value of a fund’s investments.

The opinions expressed are those of Manulife Investment Management as of the date of this publication, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. The information and/or analysis contained in this material have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use hereof or the information and/or analysis contained herein. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information. Neither Manulife Investment Management or its affiliates, nor any of their directors, officers or employees shall assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained herein.

All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife, Manulife Investment Management Limited, Manulife Investment Management, nor any of their affiliates or representatives is providing tax, investment or legal advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management.

Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, the Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.

Philip Petursson

Philip Petursson, 

Chief Investment Strategist and Head of Capital Markets Research

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio
Kevin Headland

Kevin Headland, 

Senior Investment Strategist

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio
Macan Nia

Macan Nia, 

Senior Investment Strategist

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio